🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.