🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."