What Exactly Has Gone So Wrong at Zipcar – and the UK Vehicle-Sharing Sector Dead?

The community kitchen in Rotherhithe has provided a large number of cooked meals each week for two years to pensioners and needy locals in south London. Yet, their operations have been thrown into disarray by the announcement that they will not have access to New Year’s Day.

The group depended on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that customers to access its fleet of vehicles from the street. It sent shockwaves across London when it declared it would shut down its UK business from 1 January.

This means many volunteers cannot collect food from the Felix Project, which gathers excess produce from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Obvious alternatives are further away, more expensive, or lack the same convenient access.

“It’s going to be affected massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “Personally me and my team are concerned by the logistical challenge we will face. A lot of people like ours are going to struggle.”

“Faced with this reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Major Blow for Urban Car-Sharing

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London registered as car club members, who could be left without convenient access to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. The vast majority of those people were probably with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

This shutdown, subject to consultation with staff, is a serious setback to hopes that vehicle clubs in cities could reduce the need for private vehicle ownership. However, some experts also suggested that Zipcar’s departure need not spell the end for the concept in Britain.

The Potential of Shared Mobility

Car sharing is valued by many urbanists and green advocates as a way of mitigating the ills associated with vehicle ownership. Most cars sit idle on the street for the vast majority of the time, occupying parking. They also involve large CO2 output to produce, and people without a vehicle tend to use active travel and take transit more. That benefits cities – reducing congestion and pollution – and boosts people’s health through more exercise.

Understanding the Decline

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues were minimal compared with its owner's total earnings, and a deficit that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “broader transformation across our international business, where we are taking deliberate steps to simplify processes, enhance profitability”.

Zipcar’s most recent accounts noted revenues had fallen as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the economic squeeze, which continues to suppress demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

The Capital's Specific Challenges

However, several experts noted that London has specific problems that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.

  • Patchwork Policies: Across 33 boroughs, car-club operators face a patchwork of varying processes and prices that complicate operations.
  • Congestion Charge: The closure comes as electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
  • Unequal Parking Fees: Residents in some boroughs pay just £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a significant barrier.

“Our fees should be one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

Lessons from Abroad

Nations in Europe offer examples for London to follow. Germany introduced national car-sharing legislation in 2017, providing a nationwide framework for parking, support and exemptions. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that shared mobility around the world, especially in Europe, is expanding,” said Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

He suggested authorities should start to view vehicle clubs as a form of public transport, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was looking at entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can be split into two models:

  1. Company-Owned Fleets: Which own or lease their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Person-to-Person Rentals: Which allow users to rent out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Players include Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

One company, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is assessing the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “significant chance” to win more users. “There is a void that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take a while for other players to establish themselves. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and others across London will be left without access.

For Rotherhithe community kitchen, the next month will be a rush to find a solution. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the broader impact of its departure on community groups and the future of car-sharing in the UK.

Richard Gill
Richard Gill

Elara Vance is a space technology journalist with a passion for exploring the frontiers of science and innovation.